An Open Letter to the Informant: Why I Write, and Why I’ll Keep Writing

First, I want to thank you sincerely for taking the time to read my LinkedIn posts. This is exactly why I share my articles publicly—not just in smaller circles like Telegram or alternative blogs, but on platforms like LinkedIn, where I know many readers rely primarily on official sources. Too often, critical news and perspectives that challenge the mainstream narrative simply don’t reach the broader public.

Every time someone like you provides feedback—or even files a complaint—it only reinforces my commitment to continue sharing my articles in open forums. Without efforts like these, many important issues would remain hidden from view, and meaningful discussion would be stifled.

We Are Canadians, Not Subjects of an Authoritarian State

I’d like to gently highlight—a point I believe we can all agree on— that we live in Canada—not in Russia, not in the former Soviet Union. Here, we cherish more rights and freedoms, and it is our collective responsibility to ensure that these rights are preserved and protected for future generations.

The best way to defend these rights is to exercise them regularly. Publicly expressing support for any political party or viewpoint—whether it’s the governing party or the opposition—is a key example of that. As clearly explained by the Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada (PIPSC), public servants have the full right to express political views outside the workplace and using personal resources. You can read their guidance here: https://pipsc.ca/vote2025/election-toolkit

One point worth emphasizing is PIPSC’s statement that no party should receive preferential treatment during elections. Yet, from your complaint, it appears there is a troubling assumption: that it’s acceptable for public servants to express support for the governing party, but not for opposition parties. That is not how democracy works.

The Risk of a Single Narrative

One reason I continue writing is because Canada, unlike the U.S., lacks a diverse alternative media landscape. This creates a real risk that people relying solely on official news sources will receive only one version of events—similar to what we see in Russia today, where state-controlled media dominates and alternative voices are silenced.

A chilling historical reminder is the famous 1936 photo of August Landmesser, the lone man who refused to raise his arm in the Nazi salute at a rally. Surrounded by people in ecstatic obedience, he stood alone in defiance. This image, captured early in Hitler’s rule, reminds us of the courage it takes to question dominant narratives.

Thankfully, Canada is not heading down that path—but it’s up to us to maintain an environment where critical thinking, open expression, and respectful dissent are protected and valued.

A Note on My Professional Role

It’s also important to mention that my political writings are always done outside of working hours, using my personal devices, and remain entirely separate from my department or agency. I am fully committed to my professional duties, including a major project I’m leading to introduce advanced computer vision and AI-based identification technologies that will enhance our agency’s service to Canadians.

Complaints like yours, while perhaps well-intentioned, unfortunately distract from this important work and slow down projects that directly benefit Canadians. That’s why I urge you—and others—to carefully consider the real-world consequences of filing political complaints that don’t violate any professional codes or laws.

Moving Forward: A Better Way to Engage

Once again, I appreciate your attention to my articles. I genuinely welcome dialogue. Instead of submitting reports that aim to silence necessary debate, I warmly invite you to contact me directly. Let’s have a constructive discussion on any topics you care about—even where we may differ.

As the famous saying goes:

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Let’s help ensure that Canada remains a place where open debate is welcomed, where different viewpoints are respected, and where public servants are loyal—not to any specific government—but to the public interest we are all sworn to serve.

Even now, as we see political shifts unfolding (for example, with the newly elected Mark Carney adopting some policies long proposed by the Conservatives), it becomes clear that many truths and better policies emerge only with time and a change in leadership. This reinforces why our duty is to the public good—not to any one party or politician.

Wishing you all the best as we continue working toward a stronger, freer, and more respectful Canada.

---

Related articles:

With Mark Carney at the helm, Canada embarks on a new chapter—marked by sharp critiques of Trudeau and a mix of Liberal and Conservative ideas?

Federal Election Post-Mortem: Why Pierre Poilievre Missed His Trump Moment